USPS EEO Complaint Analysis

An interactive dashboard for understanding trends, navigating the process, and identifying tactical leverage in USPS EEO filings.

The EEO Landscape: A Tale of Two Numbers

This section highlights the significant disparity between the high volume of harassment and retaliation complaints filed by USPS employees and the very low number of cases that result in a formal finding of discrimination. This gap underscores the difficulty of proving these claims and the importance of a well-prepared case.

13,250+ Complaints Filed

In FY2021, "Non-Sexual Harassment" (6,721) and "Reprisal/Retaliation" (6,529) were the top two issues alleged in the federal sector, indicating widespread employee distress.

Only 221 Findings of Discrimination

Across the entire federal government, only 221 complaints resulted in a finding of discrimination in FY2021, highlighting a high bar for evidence and successful litigation.

The Strategic Implication

The data reveals a critical challenge: proving a claim is difficult. Success hinges not just on the validity of the experience but on meticulous documentation and strategic framing of the case.


The Complaint Journey

The federal EEO process is a multi-stage journey with strict timelines. Understanding this path is the first step in navigating it effectively. Click on each stage below to see key details and the average time it adds to the process.

Select a stage above to view details.


Why Cases Succeed or Fail

The outcome of an EEO complaint often depends on two key areas: the strength of the evidence presented by the employee and the procedural conduct of the agency. This section breaks down the critical factors that can make or break a case, based on an analysis of past decisions.

Strengthening Your Claim: Key Evidence

Common Pitfalls & USPS Failures


Tactical Leverage Points for Filers

Based on the analysis, several key strategies can increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome for employees. These tactics focus on shifting the narrative from isolated incidents to systemic problems and leveraging the agency's own procedural obligations.